Monthly Archives: September 2019

TREASON BY LIES, DECEIT AND FRAUD

Inline image

 

Scroll down for the short video, click on the Home link.

Home

 

Trump takes US in a different direction!

HAARETZ

It appears that even Trump – liberator of the American Embassy in Jerusalem and conqueror of Trump Heights in the Golan – realizes that a deal with Iran is preferable to war.

After three years during which Netanyahu’s influence on Trump and his entourage on the Iran issue prevailed, there are growing signs of a change of approach in Washington. A few weeks ago, the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, was invited to the G-7 meeting in Paris, where Trump was also in attendance. Last week in London, U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said that it appeared as if Iran was “inching toward that place where we could have talks,” adding that he hoped they would really happen. Two days ago, Trump himself said he had no problem meeting Iran’s president, and that such a meeting could take place.

>> No ‘dramatic’ words from Israel, only from Washington | Analysis ■ For second day running, Trump – and Hamas – rain on Netanyahu’s grandstanding parade ■ Trump ready to meet Rohani without preconditions, Pompeo says hours after Bolton fired

Moreover, Trump chose to deliver this message only a few hours after Netanyahu had convened a special press conference – similar to the one he convened in order to push Trump into withdrawing from the accord – in which he declared that Israel had identified more sites that were part of Iran’s nuclear program. Netanyahu called on the international community “to wake up, to understand that they’re constantly lying, and join the U.S. and Israel.”

Trump’s words are a rejection of Netanyahu’s call. His willingness to meet Rohani places him on the side of the international community, led by France, which wishes to resume negotiations. On Tuesday evening, Trump went ever farther and fired his national security adviser, John Bolton – his most hawkish advisor on Iran.This shift should not be taken lightly. Netanyahu’s approach saw the accord with Iran as something akin to the 1938 Munich agreement, with Rohani as another Hitler. Netanyahu viewed any attempt to negotiate with the Iranian regime as a sign of defeatist appeasement in the Neville Chamberlain mode. Netanyahu presented Rohani as a leader one cannot negotiate with, just as Hitler could not be negotiated with. The fact that Trump publicly declared that he has no problem meeting Rohani is a rebuttal of the “Munich paradigm” touted by Netanyahu. The change in Trump’s position pulls the rug out from under Netanyahu’s campaign, which presents Iran as a Nazi monster while at the same time putting Israel’s trust in the hands of an American president who is willing to negotiate with it.

What We’ve Lost in the “War on Terror”

By Mark Nestmann • September 10, 2019

Tomorrow is the 18th anniversary of four coordinated attacks in the US by Al Qaeda operatives that killed nearly 3,000 people. While these deaths are tragic beyond words, it’s worth remembering what the world was like before September 11, 2001, and what we’ve lost since then.

The most obvious change since 9/11 has been at the airport. Before then, you didn’t have the security theater charade now in place. Today, you must empty your pockets, take your electronic devices out of your carry-on, and remove your shoes to enter the boarding area (unless you’re enrolled in the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) PreCheck).

You could take liquids through security screening and weren’t subjected to endless announcements warning you to report suspicious bags or people to authorities. You could even lock your suitcase with a non-TSA-approved lock. Indeed, the TSA itself didn’t exist until after 9/11.

You didn’t need a ticket to walk to the gate to see off a friend or family member. And when you picked them up, you could park in front of the arrivals building without being chased off by police.

These changes are just the tip of the iceberg. The truly significant changes occurred behind the scenes in the surveillance infrastructure that was installed at breakneck speed in the days and weeks after 9/11.

Less than two hours after the 9/11 attacks began, Uncle Sam set in motion an initiative called “Continuity of Government” (COG). The COG was originally a contingency plan set up in the 1980s to put America under martial law during a nuclear war. According to a 1987 article in the Miami Herald, the plan called for “suspension of the Constitution…emergency appointment of military commanders to run state and local governments and declaration of martial law during a national crisis.”

Late in 1988, in the final months of his administration, President Ronald Reagan expanded the COG plan to include any “national security emergency,” not only one caused by a nuclear war. This change was suggested by Lt. Colonel Oliver North. According to former Boston Globe reporter Ross Gelbspan, North “urged President Reagan to draw up a secret contingency plan to surveil political dissenters and [detain] hundreds of thousands of undocumented aliens in case of an unspecified national emergency.”

Thus, more than a decade before 9/11, the legal infrastructure was in place for an unprecedented expansion of Uncle Sam’s surveillance and detention authority in a national emergency.

And that’s exactly what we got after 9/11. Vice President Richard Cheney quickly took control of the COG apparatus. Within days, the key features of Oliver North’s expanded COG plan started coming into existence.

On September 14, 2001, three days after 9/11, President Bush signed Proclamation 7463. This was a declaration of national emergency giving him sweeping powers to use military force against Al Qaeda. That authority must be renewed annually and is supposed to be reviewed every six months by Congress. But Bush and all his successors, including President Trump, have now renewed this emergency declaration 17 times. And Congress has never reviewed Proclamation 7463 despite the legal requirement to do so.

A few days later, Bush signed Executive Order 13224, another declaration of national emergency. The order authorizes the president to confiscate – without trial – the property of anyone believed to support terrorism. Initially, the target list accompanying the order contained 27 names. It now contains more than 1,300 pages of names.

Cheney was instrumental in persuading Congress to enact the USA Patriot Act without meaningful debate. Among other provisions, the law greatly expanded the government’s civil forfeiture authority. And while Cheney justified the law as an anti-terror measure, it was first used in an anti-fraud investigation, a crime far removed from terrorism.

The Cheney team also created a series of legal opinions justifying the expansion of the president’s authority in a national emergency. One argued the president had the right to deploy military force without the consent of Congress. Another claimed the US had the right to disregard international agreements for the humane treatment of prisoners when alleged terrorists were captured. This document laid the groundwork for a Constitution-free zone in which suspected terrorists could be held indefinitely without being charged with a crime.

Four weeks after 9/11, Bush established the Office of Homeland Security, which eventually became the Department of Homeland Security. Bush also issued a series of directives to expand terrorist screening, leading to the creation of the No Fly List and the terrorist watchlist. As of 2014, the No Fly List contained 64,000 names. If you’re on it, you can’t board a flight leaving or entering the US or even passing over its territory. The terrorist watchlist is much larger, with about 1.16 million names as of June 2017. If you’re on this list, you can still fly. Just be prepared for a body cavity search when you try to clear security and to be handcuffed when you cross a US border.

In keeping with the original vision of Oliver North, criticizing the government is one way to wind up on the terrorist watchlist. Constitutional Law Professor Walter F. Murphy, a prominent critic of President Bush, learned this firsthand in 2007. He asked an airline employee why he was detained when trying to board a flight. The employee asked, “Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that.” Murphy responded that he had not marched but he had given a lecture that criticized Bush for violating the Constitution. “That’ll do it,” the employee responded.

Another COG initiative that found its way into post-9/11 America was the militarization of law enforcement. A new military command, NORTHCOM, was tasked with creating “fusion centers” to consolidate all possible data sources to identify potential threats. According to the Department of Homeland Security, fusion centers serve as “focal points in states and major urban areas for the receipt, analysis, gathering and sharing of threat-related information between state, local, tribal, territorial, federal and private sector partners.”

The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the military from acting as a domestic police force, but according to internal military documents leaked on WikiLeaks, fusion centers are an ideal way for the military to conduct domestic espionage without breaking the law. Thus, it should come as no surprise that “terrorist” groups like the Quakers, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Greenpeace, the Arab American Anti-Defamation Committee, and the American Civil Liberties Union have come under surveillance since 9/11.

A key focus of COG from its outset has been warrantless surveillance. To expand the government’s role, President Bush signed another executive order in 2002 to establish the Terrorist Surveillance Program. The targets were individuals allegedly connected to terrorist groups or otherwise of interest to intelligence officials. Surveillance was carried out by the secretive National Security Agency, which gained direct access to the infrastructure of America’s largest telecommunications companies. When the program was challenged in court, Bush persuaded Congress to authorize it formally in 2008. Since then, Congress has dutifully renewed this authority every five years.

Yes, America is a very different place than it was before 9/11. And we now take it for granted that in peacetime Uncle Sam needs the emergency powers originally intended to be used only after a nuclear war.

Maybe it’s time to consider your Plan B.

Protecting your assets (and yourself) against any threat – from the government, the IRS or a frivolous lawsuit – is something The Nestmann Group has helped more than 15,000 Americans do over the last 30 years.

Feel free to get in touch at service@nestmann.com or call +1 (602) 688-7552 to learn how we can help you.

Want to learn more about us first?

Why not get instant access to my very popular e-course – Inside the World of Big Money Asset Protection. It tells the story of John and Kathy, two clients we helped from the heartland of America.

We subsidize copies of the course to new readers. In other words, it’s yours free.

Many clients have used this program to really be clear about what they need to do – and how to get started. You likely will too.

To begin, we just need to know where to send it:

https://www.nestmann.com/what-weve-lost-in-the-war-on-terror?fbclid=IwAR05DrLudqZ5AgAOapNHvG2rdUHLnNtx8QRxMqzfzGrXv8W8rl6r7fn2Ar4

 

Robert Mueller helped Saudi Arabia cover up its role in 9/11 attacks

Robert Mueller was "the master when it came to covering up" 9/11, according to a lawsuit.

By Paul Sperry
Originally Published on the New York Post
After a lengthy investigation, special counsel Robert Mueller charged Russia made “multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election” and said the incursion “deserves the attention of every American.”
But former FBI investigators say their old boss didn’t feel the same concern when they uncovered multiple, systemic efforts by the Saudi government to assist the hijackers in the lead-up to the 9/11 attacks — a far more consequential, to say nothing of deadly, foreign influence operation on America.
As the head of the FBI at the time, they say Mueller was not nearly as interested in investigating that espionage conspiracy, which also involved foreign intelligence officers. Far from it, the record shows he covered up evidence pointing back to the Saudi Embassy and Riyadh — and may have even misled Congress about what he knew.
9/11 victims agree. “He was the master when it came to covering up the kingdom’s role in 9/11,” said survivor Sharon Premoli, who was pulled from the rubble of the World Trade Center 18 years ago.
“In October of 2001, Mueller shut down the government’s investigation after only three weeks, and then took part in the Bush [administration’s] campaign to block, obfuscate and generally stop anything about Saudi Arabia from being released,” added Premoli, now a plaintiff in the 9/11 lawsuit against Saudi Arabia.
In fact, Mueller threw up roadblocks in the path of his own investigators working the 9/11 case, while making it easier for Saudi suspects to escape questioning, multiple case agents told me. Then he deep-sixed what evidence his agents did manage to uncover, according to the 9/11 lawsuit against the Saudis.
Time and again, agents were called off from pursuing leads back to the kingdom’s embassy in Washington, as well as its consulate in Los Angeles, where former FBI Agent Stephen Moore headed a 9/11 task force looking into local contacts made by two of the 15 Saudi hijackers, Moore testified in an affidavit for the 9/11 lawsuit. He concluded that “diplomatic and intelligence personnel of Saudi Arabia knowingly provided material support to the two hijackers and facilitated the 9/11 plot.” Yet he and his team were not allowed to interview them, according to the suit.
In Washington, former FBI Agent John Guandolo, who worked terror cases out of the bureau’s DC office, said then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar “should have been treated as a terrorist suspect” for giving money to a woman who funded two of the 9/11 hijackers. But he was never questioned either, Guandolo said.
Instead, Mueller obliged what Guandolo called an “outrageous request” from Bandar within days of the attacks to help evacuate from the country dozens of Saudi officials, including at least one Osama bin Laden relative on the terror watch list. Mueller assured their safe passage to planes, using agents as personal escorts, according to FBI documents obtained by Judicial Watch. Agents who should have been interrogating the Saudis instead acted as their bodyguards.
In 2002, Mueller prevented agents from arresting the Saudi-sponsored al Qaeda cleric who privately counseled the Saudi hijackers, said Raymond Fournier, an agent with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in San Diego at the time. “He was responsible for vacating the arrest warrant for Anwar al-Awlaki for passport fraud,” Fournier said. He even ordered agents who detained the fiend at JFK to release him into the custody of a “Saudi representative,” Fournier said. The FBI closed their investigation of Awlaki, who was allowed to leave the US on a Saudi plane. “Shortly thereafter, the Fort Hood shooting occurred and Awlaki’s fingerprints were all over that incident,” said former FBI Agent Michael Biasello, who helped work the Texas terror case.
At the same time, Mueller removed a veteran agent from investigating a tip that an adviser to the Saudi royal family had met with some of the Saudi hijackers at his home in Sarasota, Fla., effectively killing the case, according to the lawsuit. The home was suddenly abandoned two weeks before 9/11.
Mueller even tried to shut down a congressional investigation into the Saudi hijackers and their contacts in LA and San Diego, said Bob Graham, who led the joint inquiry as Senate Intelligence Committee chair. “The strongest objections” to his staff investigators visiting FBI offices there came from the FBI director himself, said Graham, in a 2017 interview with Harper’s magazine. Among other things, Mueller refused their demands to question a paid FBI informant who roomed with the hijackers and even moved him to a safe house where they couldn’t find him, Graham said. Mueller, with the White House, redacted 28 pages detailing Saudi-9/11 ties from the congressional report.

  • He also gave testimony to Congress that was, at the very least, misleading. In an October 2002 closed-door hearing, Mueller claimed he found out about Saudi-9/11 connections only as a result of the joint inquiry’s investigative work: “[S]ome facts came to light here and to me, frankly, that had not come to light before.” Only, Moore said he gave Mueller “daily” briefings on such connections in 2001. Mueller also testified the hijackers “contacted no known terrorist sympathizers in the United States,” even though the FBI’s own case files showed they had contact with at least 14 terrorist suspects and sympathizers in the US prior to 9/11, including some working for the Saudi government. (In later testimony, he tried to walk this back, insisting he “had no intent to mislead.”)
While the Beltway media have portrayed Mueller as a by-the-book former Marine whose integrity is as square as his lantern-shaped jaw — a cop who can’t be compromised — others know better.
He’s a villain, and an arrogant one to boot,” former FBI Agent Mark Wauck said, adding that his former boss has a long history of acting as a “servant of the deep state,” or the permanent DC ruling class.
A Mueller spokesman declined to comment. But some agents say he was merely following White House orders.
“Any letting the Saudis off the hook came from the White House,” former Agent Mark Rossini said. “I can still see that photo of Bandar and Bush enjoying cigars on the balcony of the White House two days after 9/11.”
Still, others note the hypocrisy of Mueller going after President Trump for conspiring with a foreign enemy.
“Bottom line is, Mueller did not do an investigation on people involved in the 9/11 attacks who were connected to the Saudi government,” a former US counterintelligence official asserted. “Maybe if they were Russians, he would be interested. But he was not interested in investigating [Saudi] terrorists who murdered Americans.”

Media bias? Naaaah, how could it be?

Inline image

Part of Q Post 2772

9-11 NEWS: Proof Gov Wrong About Collapse of WTC Building 7? (New Evidence 2019)

Ben Swann
Published on Sep 10, 2019

What really happened to World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11th, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District Commissioners’ historic resolution calling for a new investigation, University of Alaska Fairbanks’ bombshell multi-year, $300K study of WTC 7 and how it collapsed, and an interview with Richard Gage of AE911 in episode #2 of Truth in Media with Ben Swann.

https://youtu.be/Atv31d1BmLs

 

MY THOUGHTS:

THIS HAS TO BE UNCOVERED.  ALL OF OUR TODAYS TROUBLES STEM FROM THIS EVENT AS LONG AS WE ARE NOT TOLD THE TRUTH. UNTIL THE GOVERNMENT SPELLS OUT THE TRUTH AND PROSECUTES THE GUILTY, WE WILL NEVER AGAIN BE FREE.

I MOURN WITH ALL THE PEOPLE WHO LOST LOVED ONES AND FRIENDS THIS DAY 18 YEARS AGO. I REMEMBER IT WELL

THERE ARE MANY MEMORIAL EVENTS AROUND THECOUNTRY, BUT ALL THE SPEECHES WITH OUT TELLING THE TRUTH, ARE LIKE THEY WERE POKING US IN THE EYE WITH A SHARP STICK.  GOD BLESS US ALL.

 

A message from Finland to the Q-patriots around the world.

Jarmo Ekman from Tampere, thank you for sharing such great news to us. I am originally from Helsinki, 60 vuotta sitten.

 

https://youtu.be/hUFmSYQuSKI

9-11 Sounds of Silence Tribute by Steve A. (Disturbed)

How Big Tech’s Algorithms Can Impact Opinions and Votes—and the 2020 Election

American Thought Leaders – The Epoch Times
Premiered 22 hours ago

 

 

Just what are some of the methods that tech giants like Google and Facebook can use to shift their users’ attitudes, beliefs, and even votes?

How do search engine rankings impact undecided voters?

How powerful of an impact can search engine algorithms have on our perceptions and actions, without us even knowing?

And why aren’t more people researching these things?

This is American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸, and I’m Jan Jekielek.

Today we sit down with Dr. Robert Epstein, the former editor-in-chief of Psychology Today. He is currently a senior research psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and a leading expert on search engine bias.

We explore his meticulous research into tech giant bias, and the startling discoveries he has made. We also look at Dr. Epstein’s ambitious plans to monitor and track search engine bias in the months leading up to the 2020 election.

Did You Catch Trump’s Messages, Optics Are Important, [DS] Doomed – Episode 1965b

https://youtu.be/1sITV_MBhq8

Quote

Climate Change Has been a Routine Scare Tactic Since the 1930s — Armstrong Economics

QUESTION: Is there a pattern? C ANSWER: For whatever reason, these people have been promoting that the cities will all sink and we are the cause of it all. They have been touting this scenario since the 1930s when there was the Dust Bowl. It resurfaced after World War II when they were trying to…

via Climate Change Has been a Routine Scare Tactic Since the 1930s — Armstrong Economics